While cord "shaving" used to save you a bunch of money over paying for TV service from the cable company, if you watch a lot of TV, the cost savings may not be what they once were:
Cord-cutting services are following cable TV's footsteps
Internet video stream cord-cutting services started as cheap alternatives to cable television, but now they are duplicating cable's business models with similar costs.
By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, ZDnet - January 22, 2019
https://www.zdnet.com/article/cord-cutting-services-are-following-cable-tvs-footsteps/quote:When I cut the cable cord in 2009, I saved over $100 a month and still got to watch all my shows. Ten years later, my internet video streaming bills are closing in on cable TV-level bills.
What happened?
What happened was internet streaming is copying over the tired, old cable models. Sure, the delivery technology is different, but to get the most from today's net-based television shows, you need a streaming device. That's changing, too, as full-featured streaming gets built into newer TVs with built-in Roku.
Frankly, unless you care about technology, the difference between conventional cable TV and internet TV makes little practical difference to most viewers. The one significant sore spot is for sports fans. Streaming sports lag 15 seconds to a minute behind live broadcasts
That isn't stopping people from flocking to cable-lite internet services like DirecTV Now ($40 a month), Hulu with Live TV ($40 a month), YouTube TV ($40 a month), PlayStation Vue (starts at $44.99 a month), and Sling TV (starts at $25 a month). These base prices may not sound like much, but after you get done adding in extra channels, which vary from service to service, your bill mounts up.
This is in addition to what you're paying for internet. On average, in the US, that's a smidge less than $68 a month.
Of course, in order to access many good shows, like on Netflix, such as The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina and Orange is the New Black, it's $9 to $16 a month, if you subscribe to their service. Hulu, to see The Handmaid's Tale, is $7.99 to $11.99 monthly, and Amazon Prime Video, for The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel and The Man In the High Castle, is $12.99 a month.
And then there are studios and networks, which run their own streaming services. This includes CBS's (ZDNet's parent company) CBS All Access, which starts at $5.99 per month. It has a huge archive of CBS shows, like the online-only Star Trek shows. There's also HBO Go ($14.99 a month) and DC Entertainment's DC Universe streaming service ($7.99 a month). Looking ahead, HBO-owned WarnerMedia and even Apple are building their own streaming services.
And, just over the horizon, there's Disney's Disney+. This service will offer not just Disney's traditional family fare, but exclusive access to Star Wars and Marvel Cinematic Universe shows and movies. For many people, including me, this will be a must-have service. Disney+ doesn't have a price yet. It's expected to be less than Netflix.
The prices of these services have been inching up all along. Netflix, for instance, just kicked its prices up a dollar or two per plan.
What we have now are a group of streaming services, which are lightweight duplicates of cable TV packages, and another group of that are 21st-century streaming channels. If you watch a lot of streaming TV, the costs are spiraling up,
So, I added it up. I subscribe to Amazon, CBS, Hulu, Netflix, and Sling TV -- with a variety of add-ons. My bills come to $85 a month. I just checked with Spectrum, my cable provider, and a Gold cable TV package with all the goodies would cost -- drum-roll please -- $85 per month.
Oh boy!
↧